LINARI LAW

CSSF to replace visa-approval procedure for fund prospectuses

Exciting changes are coming to Luxembourg’s fund industry! Starting April 2025, the CSSF will replace its traditional visa-approval process with a cutting-edge e-Identification system for regulated fund prospectuses. This shift promises enhanced efficiency, greater flexibility, and a fully digitalized submission process. But what does it mean for fund managers and investors?

 

Starting in April 2025, the CSSF will launch a new e-Identification system, replacing the existing visa procedure for prospectuses of certain regulated funds. This transition aims to modernize administrative processes, enhance efficiency, and maintain strong investor protection.

Under the new system, each UCITS, Part II UCI, SICAR, and SIF prospectus will receive a unique identification number and an e-Identification date, both of which will be clearly displayed on the first page of such a prospectus. All submissions for new or updated prospectuses will go through the dedicated eDesk e-Identification Prospectus application, ensuring a more streamlined and digitalized approach.

Alongside this change, the CSSF is updating its related administrative procedures. A list of amendments that do not require legal authorization or prior review will determine which amendments can now be incorporated into the prospectus without prior CSSF approval. To support market participants, a comprehensive guide will be made available via eDesk by end-March 2025.

While this initiative introduces greater flexibility, the CSSF reserves the right to conduct post-review assessments of amendments that were not subject to prior approval, in line with its risk-based approach. Importantly, any modifications that legally require CSSF authorization will continue to follow the existing approval process.

Beyond simplifying regulatory procedures, this modernization effort underscores the responsibility of fund governing bodies in ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

PREVIOUS NEXT

Related posts

Browse All

Sick leave and immediate dismissal: a clear line from the Court of Appeal

A recent decision from the Luxembourg Court of Appeal brings clarity to the legal limits of sick leave protection. On May 22, 2025, the Court ruled on a case involving the immediate dismissal of an employee during medical leave. The ruling draws a firm line between procedural missteps and actual…

Pension reform in Luxembourg: longer working lives ahead!

Luxembourg is reshaping retirement with a new pension reform that’ll make working longer the norm—without raising the official retirement age. By gradually extending contribution years and adding flexible retirement options, the plan balances tradition with modern needs.

Tokenisation: paving the way in Luxembourg’s financial sector

Tokenisation is revolutionising Luxembourg’s financial sector by enabling digital representation of real-world assets on the blockchain. It streamlines processes like fund share issuance, reduces costs, and improves transparency with auditable records. With automated compliance features such as KYC and AML, tokenisation also enhances regulatory adherence.

Know Your Assets: Strengthening ML/TF compliance for registered AIFMs

As regulatory scrutiny grows, Know Your Assets (KYA) is becoming essential for registered AIFMs managing ML/TF risks. This article outlines what KYA compliance means in practice and how AIFMs can strengthen their approach, especially for unlisted assets.

Court of Appeal clarifies the grey zone and sets out employment relationship rules

In a key judgment on April 3, 2025, the Luxembourg Court of Appeal clarified a common labour law question: when does a role qualify as employment versus a corporate mandate? The case involved claims of abusive dismissal and severance pay but ultimately hinged on the test of subordination. The ruling…

Luxembourg Court of Cassation invalidates excessive reimbursement clause hindering resignation rights

Luxembourg’s Court of Cassation has ruled that excessive financial penalties cannot restrict an employee’s right to resign. The case involved a €25,000 penalty clause imposed on a senior consultant who resigned early. The Court found the clause disproportionate and invalid. It emphasized that resignation rights are protected by public policy.…
Browse All

A LEGACY OF LAW. A FUTURE OF INNOVATION.
25 years of legal excellence – the journey continues.

Contact Info

+352 27 11 60 10

UP