LINARI LAW

Cassation in Luxembourg, a high-stakes process

Cassation appeal in Luxembourg offers a last chance to challenge court rulings on legal grounds. It focuses solely on legal errors, ensuring correct application of the law. The Court of Cassation reviews procedural mistakes and misinterpretations but does not reassess facts. With strict deadlines and no suspensive effect, timing is crucial.

How does this impact legal certainty?

Cassation appeal represents one of the most specialized legal remedies available in Luxembourg, providing parties with an opportunity to challenge judicial decisions on legal grounds. Unlike a standard appeal, which re-examines both facts and law, a cassation appeal is indeed confined solely to legal issues. The Court of Cassation’s review is limited to the legal reasoning and procedures applied in the lower court decision. The purpose is to ensure that the law has been correctly interpreted and applied by lower courts. Grounds for cassation may notably include procedural errors, misapplication of legal principles, or breaches of substantive law.

The primary objectives of cassation are:

  • To Correct Judicial Errors: the Court of Cassation evaluates whether the contested decision contains legal errors that warrant its annulment.
  • To Ensure Legal Consistency: by addressing inconsistencies in judicial decisions, the Court of Cassation promotes uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.

In Luxembourg, the time limit to file an appeal to the Court of Cassation in civil and commercial matters is two months from the notification of the judgment or decision to the concerned party. The appeal to the Court of Cassation does not have a suspensive effect, except in specific cases provided by law. This means that any final decision requiring payment, for example, will still be executed even if a cassation appeal is filed.

The role of cassation in Luxembourg’s judicial system is underscored by its application in civil and commercial cases. In 2023, the Court of Cassation rendered 78 judgments in these areas, highlighting its significance in resolving disputes and shaping legal precedent. Cassation appeal often represents the final stage of a lawsuit for the claimant, and the stakes are high.

Representation before the Court of Cassation requires comprehensive knowledge of procedural rules and legal principles, a high level of drafting skill, and the mandatory assistance of an Avocat à la Cour.

PREVIOUS NEXT

Related posts

Browse All

Sick leave and immediate dismissal: a clear line from the Court of Appeal

A recent decision from the Luxembourg Court of Appeal brings clarity to the legal limits of sick leave protection. On May 22, 2025, the Court ruled on a case involving the immediate dismissal of an employee during medical leave. The ruling draws a firm line between procedural missteps and actual…

Pension reform in Luxembourg: longer working lives ahead!

Luxembourg is reshaping retirement with a new pension reform that’ll make working longer the norm—without raising the official retirement age. By gradually extending contribution years and adding flexible retirement options, the plan balances tradition with modern needs.

Tokenisation: paving the way in Luxembourg’s financial sector

Tokenisation is revolutionising Luxembourg’s financial sector by enabling digital representation of real-world assets on the blockchain. It streamlines processes like fund share issuance, reduces costs, and improves transparency with auditable records. With automated compliance features such as KYC and AML, tokenisation also enhances regulatory adherence.

Know Your Assets: Strengthening ML/TF compliance for registered AIFMs

As regulatory scrutiny grows, Know Your Assets (KYA) is becoming essential for registered AIFMs managing ML/TF risks. This article outlines what KYA compliance means in practice and how AIFMs can strengthen their approach, especially for unlisted assets.

Court of Appeal clarifies the grey zone and sets out employment relationship rules

In a key judgment on April 3, 2025, the Luxembourg Court of Appeal clarified a common labour law question: when does a role qualify as employment versus a corporate mandate? The case involved claims of abusive dismissal and severance pay but ultimately hinged on the test of subordination. The ruling…

Luxembourg Court of Cassation invalidates excessive reimbursement clause hindering resignation rights

Luxembourg’s Court of Cassation has ruled that excessive financial penalties cannot restrict an employee’s right to resign. The case involved a €25,000 penalty clause imposed on a senior consultant who resigned early. The Court found the clause disproportionate and invalid. It emphasized that resignation rights are protected by public policy.…
Browse All

A LEGACY OF LAW. A FUTURE OF INNOVATION.
25 years of legal excellence – the journey continues.

Contact Info

+352 27 11 60 10

UP