LINARI LAW

Sick leave and immediate dismissal: a clear line from the Court of Appeal

The Luxembourg Court of Appeal ruled on May 22, 2025 in a case concerning an immediate dismissal during an employee’s sick leave. (Arrêt N° 61/25, Numéro CAL-2024-00359 du role.)

The decision provides important clarification on (i) the scope of protection against dismissal during medical incapacity, (ii) the formal requirements for such protection, and (iii) the legal characterization of fault justifying termination

The case involved an employee who had been on certified medical leave since April 2022.

Although she duly submitted multiple medical certificates for prior absences, she failed to ensure the timely reception of a new certificate extending her incapacity as of July 25, 2022.

The certificate was only received by the employer on July 28, i.e., on the fourth day of the extension, whereas Article L.121-6 of the Labour Code requires that the employer be in possession of such a document within three days.

The Court held that the date of receipt—not the date of sending—is decisive and that, as a result, the employee was not protected against dismissal due to her illness.

However, the Court found that the employer was not justified in terminating the employment contract with immediate effect.

Although the employee’s failure to meet the legal deadline for transmitting the medical certificate constituted a fault, it did not rise to the level of “grave misconduct” (“faute grave”) necessary for immediate dismissal under Article L.124-10.

The Court emphasized that absence due to illness—once documented—is not inherently wrongful and that the employee had otherwise consistently complied with her prior notice obligations. Therefore, the dismissal was ruled abusive.

The Court awarded the employee compensation in the form of a notice period indemnity equivalent to two months’ salary and moral damages of €1,500. However, it rejected the claim for material damages, as the employee failed to demonstrate active job-seeking efforts or a direct causal link between the dismissal and her financial loss beyond the pre-dismissal period already covered by the notice indemnity.

Feel free to reach out to our team to discuss your projects or to request more information about our services.

PREVIOUS

Related posts

Browse All

Pension reform in Luxembourg: longer working lives ahead!

Luxembourg is reshaping retirement with a new pension reform that’ll make working longer the norm—without raising the official retirement age. By gradually extending contribution years and adding flexible retirement options, the plan balances tradition with modern needs.

Tokenisation: paving the way in Luxembourg’s financial sector

Tokenisation is revolutionising Luxembourg’s financial sector by enabling digital representation of real-world assets on the blockchain. It streamlines processes like fund share issuance, reduces costs, and improves transparency with auditable records. With automated compliance features such as KYC and AML, tokenisation also enhances regulatory adherence.

Know Your Assets: Strengthening ML/TF compliance for registered AIFMs

As regulatory scrutiny grows, Know Your Assets (KYA) is becoming essential for registered AIFMs managing ML/TF risks. This article outlines what KYA compliance means in practice and how AIFMs can strengthen their approach, especially for unlisted assets.

Court of Appeal clarifies the grey zone and sets out employment relationship rules

In a key judgment on April 3, 2025, the Luxembourg Court of Appeal clarified a common labour law question: when does a role qualify as employment versus a corporate mandate? The case involved claims of abusive dismissal and severance pay but ultimately hinged on the test of subordination. The ruling…

Luxembourg Court of Cassation invalidates excessive reimbursement clause hindering resignation rights

Luxembourg’s Court of Cassation has ruled that excessive financial penalties cannot restrict an employee’s right to resign. The case involved a €25,000 penalty clause imposed on a senior consultant who resigned early. The Court found the clause disproportionate and invalid. It emphasized that resignation rights are protected by public policy.…
Browse All

A LEGACY OF LAW. A FUTURE OF INNOVATION.
25 years of legal excellence – the journey continues.

Contact Info

+352 27 11 60 10

UP